AEC Authorizing Legislation, Fiscal Year 1969

AEC Authorizing Legislation, Fiscal Year 1969
Author: United States. Congress. Joint Committee on Atomic Energy
Publisher:
Total Pages: 940
Release: 1968
Genre:
ISBN:

pt.1: Considers S. 2880 and companion H.R. 14905, to authorize appropriations for AEC. Focuses on general budget and reactor development program; pt.2: Continuation of hearings on AEC FY69 authorization. Appendix includes reports. a. "National Accelerator Laboratory, Design Report 1968, Universities Research Associates, " prepared by AEC 1968 (p. 1223-1456). b. "Report of Ad Hoc Panel on Low-Beta Toroidal Plasma Research, " Sept. 1967 (p. 1459-1583). c. "Bronco Oil Shale Study, " prepared by AEC, Interior Dept, CER Geonuclear Corp., and Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Oct. 13, 1967 (p. 1743-1813).

AEC Authorizing Legislation

AEC Authorizing Legislation
Author: United States. Congress. Joint Committee on Atomic Energy
Publisher:
Total Pages: 670
Release: 1970
Genre:
ISBN:

Project Plowshare

Project Plowshare
Author: Scott Kaufman
Publisher: Cornell University Press
Total Pages: 313
Release: 2012-11-20
Genre: History
ISBN: 0801465834

Inspired by President Dwight D. Eisenhower's "Atoms for Peace" speech, scientists at the Atomic Energy Commission and the University of California's Radiation Laboratory began in 1957 a program they called Plowshare. Joined by like-minded government officials, scientists, and business leaders, champions of "peaceful nuclear explosions" maintained that they could create new elements and isotopes for general use, build storage facilities for water or fuel, mine ores, increase oil and natural gas production, generate heat for power production, and construct roads, harbors, and canals. By harnessing the power of the atom for nonmilitary purposes, Plowshare backers expected to protect American security, defend U.S. legitimacy and prestige, and ensure access to energy resources. Scott Kaufman's extensive research in nearly two dozen archives in three nations shows how science, politics, and environmentalism converged to shape the lasting conflict over the use of nuclear technology. Indeed, despite technological and strategic promise, Plowshare's early champions soon found themselves facing a vocal and powerful coalition of federal and state officials, scientists, industrialists, environmentalists, and average citizens. Skeptical politicians, domestic and international pressure to stop nuclear testing, and a lack of government funding severely restricted the program. By the mid-1970s, Plowshare was, in the words of one government official, "dead as a doornail." However, the thought of using the atom for peaceful purposes remains alive.