Author | : United States Information Agency. Office of Research |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 96 |
Release | : 1976 |
Genre | : Public opinion |
ISBN | : |
Author | : United States Information Agency. Office of Research |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 96 |
Release | : 1976 |
Genre | : Public opinion |
ISBN | : |
Author | : Foreign Affairs Research Documentation Center |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 354 |
Release | : 1977 |
Genre | : Economic history |
ISBN | : |
Author | : United States. Superintendent of Documents |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 1228 |
Release | : 1978 |
Genre | : Government publications |
ISBN | : |
February issue includes Appendix entitled Directory of United States Government periodicals and subscription publications; September issue includes List of depository libraries; June and December issues include semiannual index
Author | : United States. Department of State. Office of External Research |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 552 |
Release | : 1976 |
Genre | : International relations |
ISBN | : |
Author | : Samson Kaunga Ndanyi |
Publisher | : Rowman & Littlefield |
Total Pages | : 167 |
Release | : 2022-03-14 |
Genre | : History |
ISBN | : 1793649251 |
In Instructional Cinema and African Audiences in Colonial Kenya, 1926–1963, the author argues against the colonial logic instigating that films made for African audiences in Kenya influenced them to embrace certain elements of western civilization but Africans had nothing to offer in return. The author frames this logic as unidirectional approach purporting that Africans were passive recipients of colonial programs. Contrary to this understanding, the author insists that African viewers were active participants in the discourse of cinema in Kenya. Employing unorthodox means to protest mediocre films devoid of basic elements of film production, African spectators forced the colonial government to reconsider the way it produced films. The author frames the reconsideration as bidirectional approach. Instructional cinema first emerged as a tool to “educate” and “modernize” Africans, but it transformed into a contestable space of cultural and political power, a space that both sides appropriated to negotiate power and actualize their abstract ideas.